MK-293 vs other SARMs: which one is more effective?
So I've been looking into SARMs lately, trying to figure out which one might give me the best bang for my buck. I’ve already tried Ostarine and LGD-4033 with decent results — lean mass gains, a bit of strength, nothing crazy. Now I’m hearing a lot of buzz around MK-293, but it's pretty new to me. Has anyone here actually tested MK-293 and can compare it to the usual suspects? Is it more potent or just marketing fluff?
11 visualizzazioni
Hey, I’ve been in the same boat and actually ran MK-293 for six weeks earlier this year. Compared to LGD-4033, which gave me more water retention and less definition, MK-293 felt a lot “cleaner,” if that makes sense. My strength gains were slightly slower to kick in, but by week 4, I noticed much more vascularity and harder muscles. Also, I didn’t get the same mild headaches I sometimes get from RAD-140. What really stood out was recovery — DOMS was basically gone within a day. I tracked everything, and even though weight gain wasn’t dramatic, my lean mass ratio improved significantly. I got most of my info (and actually the product) from this site mk 677 for sale — it breaks things down pretty well, including the mechanism behind how MK-293 works. Worth a read if you’re on the fence.